Has this strategy passed the bare minimum quality bar?
The Phase A gates form the gatekeeping triad of the AAM pipeline. Profit Factor, Win Rate, and Max Drawdown act as the minimum-viable filters that every strategy container must pass before any accumulation-specific evaluation begins. Their job is not to identify the best strategies — it is to eliminate the unviable ones early, before they consume Phase B–E computational resources or, worse, capital.
- Universally understood across the financial industry — institutional allocators and regulators can audit AAM qualification decisions in familiar language.
- Conservative thresholds (PF ≥ 5.0, Win% ≥ 50, DD% > −25) signal institutional-grade quality standards before any proprietary AAM logic engages.
- Provides a stable comparative baseline — when downstream AAM metrics shift, the team can verify whether change reflects accumulation dynamics or merely shifting qualification standards.
- Externally auditable. Phase A scores can be reproduced by any third-party from raw trade history, supporting transparency claims.
- Strategy-pool quality dashboard (headline gates for every container)
- New-strategy intake from testnet — pass = move to Phase B
- Periodic re-qualification triggered by sustained PF compression or Win% drift
- Retail and institutional dashboards — single-glance trust signal
| aQUALIFY | Direct input | Phase A scores feed the aQUALIFY composite via weighted average. |
| aCOMPOSITE | Foundation tier | Used as the qualification component before consistency, momentum, or risk synthesis. |
| qMULTIPLE | Independent | High PF/Win% does not imply high qMULTIPLE — strategy may be net-flat in asset units. |
| aRATE% | Necessary, not sufficient | Strategies failing PF cannot produce sustainable aRATE%; passing PF is insufficient evidence of accumulation. |